Does it still make any sense to maintain dividing lines or boundaries between sciences or disciplines? In other words, are epistemological hierarchies still valid? Wouldn’t it be more productive, beginning with teaching, that the narratives were free of obstacles between them? As knowledge advances, themes expand and intertwine.To the point that we can affirm that the present understanding ends up reflecting our ignorance much more than our reply to the various issues. In fact, the most profound questions remain open for debate.
I feel this is a boon in at least two ways. First, at any time, new”truths” can be attained – albeit provisional, which can be translated by the classic saying of the Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951):”to point out the jar”. Second, it is crucial to recognize this immaculate search allows us to be rationally free from the dominion of other men. At this time, we can say, then, that philosophy is truly only a process. To put it differently, philosophy does not give us knowledge, but understanding, and this can be frustrating, as Sir Anthony Kenny noted. Wildlife Removal Palm Bay
Subsequently, Wittgenstein takes this philosophical understanding more as the experience of a trip than as the arrival at a destination. (And travel is everything; that’s what we learn from Konstantinos Kaváfis’ poem”Ithaca”). In a nutshell, for Wittgenstein, philosophy is a process or activity. It appears that we are constantly coming”home” in doctrine. After so many centuries, the founding stance seems to be losing its raison d’être. In any case, and here comes Wittgenstein’s proposal, we need, perhaps, to understand philosophy or the search for knowledge as a search for clarity.
Therefore, fulfilling the longing for generality, we must conclude, with Wittgenstein, that it is no longer possible to fail the particular data, but to consider that if assembling a model of description of this phenomenon or data under study, we have already done everything or almost everything that was possible to do right now. The always provisory characteristic of human investigation.
After all, Wittgenstein recognized that the logical structure of language could be visible on its surface. The Austrian sage did not want to propose theories. But describe in detail what’s happening: this summarizes your analysis. To sum up, it is up to the philosopher to”put things” clearly.